I think the price of Flex has been a very big discussion right from its initial release.
Here's the problem that I see and others can correct me if I am wrong. At the price tag that it is currently at, it means that only very big corporations that could use it would be able to afford it, however if I was able to justify the price tag for our framework here and yes flex would be very handy to have but that means our price for what we offer would increase ten fold to justify switching over to it. Smaller company's would love to use it, like us but see it is well maybe one day when we get a client big enough to help with the cost of it. Or you could take a gamble and develop with it and hope that you land a client that is willing to pay extra for the work, which I would say is were Rocket Boots are they obviously will not have a problem but others will. So that brings me to the question, would it not be more beneficial to lower the price and make it more available to developers to afford the licence and also make it harder for other competitors to compete with the product? Regards Andrew Scott Technical Consultant NuSphere Pty Ltd Level 2/33 Bank Street South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205 Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976 --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
