Yeah, I thought about that. One option would be building 2 systems, an inferior one for them and the "take-over-the-world" version (TOTW ver1.3) for me. Problem is that I don't have the time in the day to build and maintain two unique systems, as I am cycling myself as it is.
And following with the MVC thing, the system can adapt to different views, be it HTML, DHTML, Flash or what have you, in a plug-and-play manner. So just changing the view won't work either, as the underlying framework is still the same. I think I'm just going to have to be up front and get it all documented now before I get too far into it. Either that, or blow up the company and buy the IP at auction. Chad who would probably go away for a long time if the company blew up today On 5/12/05, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But once it's a Porche, he may not let it out of the garage. > > Chad, someone else suggested 2 versions - their dhtml, your Flex... > > the only thing in common would be functionality*. Is that enough IP to > worry about? > > dunno, just a thought > > barry.b > > *and maybe the CFC's, etc > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
