Matt:

I think it would be good to elaborate on what you are hoping to compare.

One suggestion: rather than start with a full-blown application, perhaps
identify more discrete sets of reusable application functionality and work
on those first.  That would require less of a time commitment than building
an entire application (ie: Pet Store) from scratch and would, perhaps, get
at some of the same issues as far as comparing different ways to leverage
CFMX.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 8:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [CFCDev] bakeoff
>
>
> It seems that since the release of CFMX many CF developers have been
> rethinking how they build CF applications thanks to new abilities
> through the use of CFCs and/or tighter Java integration. This has led to
> quite a lot of discussion over frameworks and methodologies as of late.
> I thought it might be interesting to have a bakeoff to get some
> comparison metrics on these different techniques.
>
> The idea would be to take one set of application requirements and then
> build an application using each of these techniques. Metrics like time
> taken to develop, lines of code, performance, etc could all be captured
> for each. Obviously, developing all of these applications would take a
> considerable amount of time. However, if many people were interested we
> could each take one technique each and then share our results.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> 888-408-0900 x901
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

Reply via email to