Matt: I think it would be good to elaborate on what you are hoping to compare.
One suggestion: rather than start with a full-blown application, perhaps identify more discrete sets of reusable application functionality and work on those first. That would require less of a time commitment than building an entire application (ie: Pet Store) from scratch and would, perhaps, get at some of the same issues as far as comparing different ways to leverage CFMX. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Matt Liotta > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 8:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > It seems that since the release of CFMX many CF developers have been > rethinking how they build CF applications thanks to new abilities > through the use of CFCs and/or tighter Java integration. This has led to > quite a lot of discussion over frameworks and methodologies as of late. > I thought it might be interesting to have a bakeoff to get some > comparison metrics on these different techniques. > > The idea would be to take one set of application requirements and then > build an application using each of these techniques. Metrics like time > taken to develop, lines of code, performance, etc could all be captured > for each. Obviously, developing all of these applications would take a > considerable amount of time. However, if many people were interested we > could each take one technique each and then share our results. > > Thoughts? > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > 888-408-0900 x901 > > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
