It seems that my answer did not get through the list on sunday (at least, I
haven't received it).
So here it is again (sorry if it is a duplicate, but I have added some more
comments).

That's a great initiative.
We could learn a lot by sharing our techniques and experience each one of us
has on CFMX.
We have to choose a blueprint application type.

As macromedia.com has already released its ColdFusionMX version of
Petmarket, it might be interesting to propose our own, based on the
methodology/framework we use.
The advandatage of using Petmarket is that there is already all the
requirements in terms of interface, design, functionalities and database. It
would save a big amount of time.
We would only have to focus on the architecture of the application.
The other advantage is that Petmarket/Petstore is a typical application to
compare frameworks and technologies.
It could be nice to able to show the power of CFMX to our .NET/J2EE
"collegues".

Petmarket already includes some interesting requirements :
- minimal content management (display of categorized products instead of
articles),
- search engine,
- session management (with a cart mechanism),
- flow process and forms (during check out process).

Petmarket does not include some other typical requirements such as
authentication mechanism.
But we could add a small "Backoffice" area, to be able to add or remove
products from the database.
This would add :
- authentication,
- forms for data/items management.

I propose to build one version of it, based on MVC with CFCs for the model
layer.

It would be nice if someone could build a Fusebox (3/4/MX?) Petmarket
version, in order to be able to compare.

What do you think of Petmarket as a blueprint application?
Who else is interested?

Benoit Hediard
www.benorama.com

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

Reply via email to