I agree on persistence. No need to specify how something is to be persisted; let the framework decide. In fact, it may be interesting to see how different persistence techniques play out in the comparison.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Nathan Dintenfass > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > I think that will vary for each style of implementation. Rather than > having > everyone need to use the same XML/data format, I suggest the requirement > simply be the persistence should be pluggable -- perhaps with an agreed > upon > API (or, at least, a single API for each "baked dish"). > > In addition to the functionality of the blog itself, I think this exercise > would benefit from explicitly creating some modular (as in, reusable) > functionality for common application functions like: > > 1) User Authentication/Authorization (for the back-end) -- perhaps > agreeing > there are two "user types" ("god" users and content publishers, perhaps) > > 2) Form/Data validation and the resulting error/notification messages > showed > to the user. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Benjamin S. Rogers > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > > > > By that, do you mean XML? If so, would you like to propose a file > > structure? > > > > Benjamin S. Rogers > > http://www.c4.net/ > > v.508.240.0051 > > f.508.240.0057 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Bryan F. Hogan > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:23 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > > > > Ok, I jumped in late. I'm on the same page now. > > > > Here is my 2: > > > > The storage mechanism should be file based. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Matt Liotta > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:19 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > > > > I don't have a timeframe and I thought we were just working on the list > > of requirements. > > > > Matt Liotta > > President & CEO > > Montara Software, Inc. > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > 888-408-0900 x901 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf > > > Of Bryan F. Hogan > > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:13 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > > > > Is there a timeframe? Do you have a list of requirements available. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Behalf Of Matt Liotta > > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:52 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff > > > > > > > > > > I think the RSS feed(s) could be produced using presentation > > templates > > > > rather than a separate mechanism. > > > > > > > That is what I meant actually; sorry for the confusion. > > > > > > > Also the ability to turn comments on/off for a particular post or to > > > close > > > > comments off. > > > > * Add/edit/delete comments > > > > > > > Good point! > > > > > > > Also (this might be a bit much) > > > > * A bulk entry import/export mechanism > > > > > > > Agreed on the bit much. > > > > > > > The production of dynamic pages (over writing html files) is > > > preferable > > > > given our aim, though from an application perspective, producing > > > static > > > > pages has a number of advantages. > > > > > > > Indeed it would be preferable for our bakeoff. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
