I think that will vary for each style of implementation. Rather than having
everyone need to use the same XML/data format, I suggest the requirement
simply be the persistence should be pluggable -- perhaps with an agreed upon
API (or, at least, a single API for each "baked dish").
In addition to the functionality of the blog itself, I think this exercise
would benefit from explicitly creating some modular (as in, reusable)
functionality for common application functions like:
1) User Authentication/Authorization (for the back-end) -- perhaps agreeing
there are two "user types" ("god" users and content publishers, perhaps)
2) Form/Data validation and the resulting error/notification messages showed
to the user.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Benjamin S. Rogers
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff
>
>
> By that, do you mean XML? If so, would you like to propose a file
> structure?
>
> Benjamin S. Rogers
> http://www.c4.net/
> v.508.240.0051
> f.508.240.0057
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bryan F. Hogan
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff
>
>
> Ok, I jumped in late. I'm on the same page now.
>
> Here is my 2:
>
> The storage mechanism should be file based.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff
>
>
> I don't have a timeframe and I thought we were just working on the list
> of requirements.
>
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> 888-408-0900 x901
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf
> > Of Bryan F. Hogan
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:13 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff
> >
> > Is there a timeframe? Do you have a list of requirements available.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:52 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] bakeoff
> >
> >
> > > I think the RSS feed(s) could be produced using presentation
> templates
> > > rather than a separate mechanism.
> > >
> > That is what I meant actually; sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > > Also the ability to turn comments on/off for a particular post or to
> > close
> > > comments off.
> > > * Add/edit/delete comments
> > >
> > Good point!
> >
> > > Also (this might be a bit much)
> > > * A bulk entry import/export mechanism
> > >
> > Agreed on the bit much.
> >
> > > The production of dynamic pages (over writing html files) is
> > preferable
> > > given our aim, though from an application perspective, producing
> > static
> > > pages has a number of advantages.
> > >
> > Indeed it would be preferable for our bakeoff.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
