We still use CFStudio at work but I'd say the whole list of options is so silly that nobody would really care what product won that vote. How can you compare DW and FL separately to Studio MX? How can you compare those to a graphics server (which came in third??)
The topic is so vague it's useless. If it was "Best ColdFusion development tool" then it'd be another story. Sam > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Cameron > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CFCDev] [OT] CFDJ Awards > > > Sorry for off-topic post, but I think it's a significant > issue (kind of). > > I notice on the CFDJ Readers' "Choice", there's no CHOICE to > vote for ColdFusion Studio as the best Development Tool. > > Is this subtle opinion manipulation so DWMX comes out on top? > I would be VERY SURPRISED if *most* CF developers thing it's > better than CFS (if they had the option to indicate as such). > Even if it's a retired product, if it's the most popular, it > deserves to be identified as such. Especially it it helps MM > realise that DWMX is not a completely suitable successor to CFS. > > URL: > http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/readerschoice2003/liveupdate .cfm?BType =8 ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
