Actually, I left that out as I saw no need to add the extra validation and the overhead it brings. I know it's something tiny, but if its not needed, I leave it out.
> >Just to be anal, I'd say it's not a good practice to define structures > >like that. I'd at least do: > > > ><cfparam name="application.cfc" default="#structNew()#"> > > > >MX fixed the issue with auto-creation of structs, but I still think it's > >better to be explicit. > > Just to be doubly anal (is that possible?), wouldn't you want to specify the > "type" attribute as well? > > <cfparam name="application.cfc" type="struct" default="#structNew()#"> > > Just following your last sentence!! ;) > > Regards, > Dave. > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
