Actually, I left that out as I saw no need to add the extra validation and the
overhead it brings. I know it's something tiny, but if its not needed, I leave
it out.
How much is the additional overhead? I find it hard to believe that it's anything noticeable. Have you run any stress testing to indicate otherwise? Ironically, I had actually heard that *not* having the type attribute was slower. My personal preference is to always be as explicit as possible, when reasonable. But, to me, that's all minutiae, as I think we're talking about tenths of milliseconds, and the true focus should be on caching and other higher-level things (unless, of course, your testing has proven otherwise).
Regards, Dave.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
