Just to break it down with numbers. Each CFMX instance is supposed to take about 30megs of RAM each. Since it is generally tough for an application to use more than 1gig of RAM on a 32bit machine that means only about 30 people could be hosted on the same machine.
-Matt
On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Samuel Neff wrote:
Certainly CFMX 4 J2EE can be secured just as well as any Java app can since
that's what it is, and with the multiple CFMX instances support this would
be great for middle-tier shared hosting (between regular shared and
co-location).
Can I have dibs on the intro for your new website? Got to hit the archives
for some of your more memorable quotes.. :-)
Sam
---------------------------------------------- Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting ----------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RES: [CFCDev] CF hosting provider?
Suggesting that a badly configured system will always be insecure avoids the whole point. The question is can a shared hosting environment be secure. Well it depends on the application server. Can you do it with Java? Yes! Can you do it with CFMX? No!
And since you have so much free time to criticize me, I expect a "I hate Matt" web site launch shortly. ;)
-Matt
---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
