I wouldn't reinitialize it. That's what I'm trying to avoid. I said I'd reinstantiate it, which is a different word, although they make look similar to a fast reader... :-)
I'm trying to replace the recently instantiated object with an older cached version (one that has been initialized). My real hope is that I can then avoid having to write a stateless CFC to manage cached CFC's for Flash. -----Original Message----- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Caching a CFC But if you have a version in cache, why reinitialize it anyway? You've already initialized it once. I don't understand what you're trying to do... On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 15:19 US/Pacific, Brad Howerter wrote: > I'd instantiate it anyway, yes, but I wouldn't have to reinitialize it. > Pretend that part of the '...' below is a method to initialize the > object > and it takes a long time to run. > > And that's why I want it to replace itself with an old instance of > itself, > too, so it doesn't have to be reinitialized. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
