Re: [CFCDev] Private Variable

[Sean A Corfield]

I know this might seem a strange question John, but given the strength 
of Fusebox, the recent release of Fusebox 4 and, more recently, the 
extremely good Mach II framework, why are you going to so much trouble 
to create a Fusebox-like framework?

On Thursday, Aug 28, 2003, at 08:28 US/Pacific, John Farrar wrote:

Yes... it is what I was thinking. I am writting an action cfc that is
instantiated by the core site files. Then each action has multiple
methods... like set and get attributes. It also has a do() method that 
takes
as parameters the circuit action being called and the circuits 
structure...
thus it is dump to the world around it... but is given the needed
information to call the correct files. (When the do is called, it also
creates another "nested???" action object that allows isolated calls to
another circuit action. It works very cool! Just wanted to know if 
there was
a way to avoid possibility of overwritting variables from the 
include...
which I thought woud be impossible... but sometimes they add things and
don't document it, right! (It is pretty neat to run an action and to 
choose
if it gets the callers attributes, and if upon completion the caller 
takes
the modified attributes to overwrite it's attributes.) Makes things 
more
granular, and gives more control.

John Farrar

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Brooks-Bilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Private Variable

John,

Is the include in the "pseudo-constructor" area, or within a CFC 
method?
If the include is in the constructor, and you var your method 
variables,
those method variables are only available to the code within the 
method
and
not the included code in the constructor area.  If the include is 
within a
method, then it is part of that method, and any variables declared in 
the
method are part of the include.  Does that make sense?

-Rob



"John Farrar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cfczone.org on 08/28/2003
07:52:46 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To:    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:    [CFCDev] Private Variable

Is there a private variable that is local to the CFC ... but cannot be
seen
or modified by includes in a CFC.

(Oh, my use of CFC merits includes and does so without  violating
encapsulation. Please don't send me lectures about that subject... it 
is
off
topic to my request... thanks.)

John Farrar
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]