I say "Custom tags aren't needed anymore now that we have CFCs". -----Original Message----- From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Display in CFCs
I agree, however, the main point of my original question is: Should custom tags "see" all scopes, or should they be passed in thru the attributes? Should custom tags be treated the same as CFCs as far as encapsulation goes? I'm just looking for other's experiences with this. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Display in CFCs I don't think there's anything wrong with doing display in a CFC as long as that's the whole point of the CFC. Don't mix up database and business logic code with display code. As long as you stick to that, where you put your display code (a custom tag or a cfc) makes no difference. Sam ---------------------------------------------- Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting ---------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Howerter > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:06 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [CFCDev] Display in CFCs > > I'd like to have a religious war on whether to use CFCs or > Custom Tags for > display. I tried to start one on CF-Talk a few weeks ago, > but it didn't get > much of a response. I've never seen this fleshed out very > well anywhere. > > What are the reasons for NOT having methods that return HTML > strings as a > result? All I ever read is "It's stupid" or "It's bad". To > me it makes > sense to do it in a CFC as opposed to a tag, because then you > have self > documenting methods (instead of poorly documented tags). And > I don't see a > downside to it. If I have, say, a person object, why > shouldn't it know how > to display itself? It's probably not as clean a solution as > having xml and > xslt, but to me it seems better than having a custom tag > displaying the > html. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
