> 
> You're right, Ray, noone is saying we should make getters and 
> setters for all instance data, and there would be no reason 
> to write an article to convince people not to do that.
> 
> That wasn't the point of the article.  The point was that 
> getter/setter functions are evil.  Holub's saying it doesn't 
> make sense to share atomic data with the world.

I don't think I'm the only one who made this mistake - so I guess I'm
not the only idiot. There _is_ something to be said about being sure you
deliver your message correctly.

-rc


----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to