Matt,
None of my larger objects(People, Customer, Order, Invoice) can create and
save a complete object for under 100ms.  Now some of these consist of
multiple pages, and others see time drop considerably with usage as caching
kicks in.  My Even my Find pages take about 230ms (Verity search).

Database queries take most of this time.  I wonder how much this will
change(hopefully improve) when I complete the move from Access to MS SQL.

I wonder if I am in for some heartache as usage picks up.  Or perhaps the
better question is how many users will it take before I get the big
performance hit.

Is this 100ms number primarily for dynamic pages or do you apply this to
transactions as well?

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] CFC Performance question


IMHO, 100ms for a page request is the magic number. All pages when
tested individually should be at 100ms or lower. Why 100ms?
Multithreaded issues aside, 100ms means 10 pages per second, which is a
very reasonable expectation of performance for a web application that
hasn't be tuned or designed for performance.

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901


----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to