"I can't imagine how an OO person would be very happy with CFCs considering how shallow the OO capabilities of CFCs are."
I come from a strict OO background and I enjoy CFCs quite a bit; because I accept them for what they can and can not do. They were never touted as being FULLY OO and WE knew they were going to have limitations.... But despite the limitations, they are a very useful and powerful feature that I will continue to leverage. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Native CF tags and local scope The very fact that CFCs went through a lot of implementation iterations shows just how slapped together they were. There are plenty of examples where design flaws became features e.g. the pseudo-constructor area or worse, the output attribute. Why anyone would think it would be a good idea to apply tri-state logic against a boolean attribute I don't know. I can't imagine how an OO person would be very happy with CFCs considering how shallow the OO capabilities of CFCs are. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.MontaraSoftware.com (888) 408-0900 x901 ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
