Speaking of BD, how does it handle the CFPROCESSINGDIRECTIVE issue?Sounds like a question for the BD list.
Along these lines, anyone have a clever idea to differentiate the CFMXI'd hate to do that for fear of making the vendors think we are alright with the situation. Now that there are three vendors in the mix, it is really time for a language specification that all vendors adhere to. I'm okay with them doing extensions beyond that, but I think we all deserve a CFML specification that if we adhere to it when we are developing, we know our applications will work across all implementations.
language from it's different implementations (MM's ColdFusion MX, NA's
BlueDragon, perhaps others)? So when making statements like these it can be
clear whether it's a language features/bug or a implementation feature/bug.
Not that there is a formal language spec, though that would be nice.
-Matt
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
