Since you asked, IMHO all discussion of BlueDragon syntax really belongs on a Blue Dragon list.
I disagree - I think it's very healthy to discuss subtle differences like these between various implementations. In additional to the original Macromedia ColdFusion implementation (CFMX currently), we now have an increasingly mature New Atlanta implementation (BD) and some "smaller" implementations like Coral and IgniteFusion. Coral, IgniteFusion and BlueDragon all have varying degrees of compatibility with CFMX as well as their own ColdFusion language extensions (IgniteFusion, for example, has <cfsql> and <cffor> tags).
This is a CFC list so I think it's reasonable to discuss *any* ColdFusion Component issues here, regardless of vendor (and especially when vendors differ in their implementations). If you look at the C++ lists, you'll see a lot of that sort of discussion and, to some extent, on the Java lists too. The former has a full ISO Standard (that I spent eight years helping to create) and yet it still has many incompatible implementations!
Regards, Sean
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
