Re: [CFCDev] OT: BD / CF

[Matt Liotta]

There is a slippery slope that all the vendors are standing on top of. 
A language specification is the only answer. Requiring BD to follow CF 
is not an answer as it doesn't help competition in any way, which I 
think is finally starting to happen. You'll agree when you see one of 
BD's features show up in CF. I picks would be cfimap, cfimage, or 
possible the CFC enhancements the community asked for that BD 
delivered. Maybe we will even see CF on .NET.

-Matt

On Mar 16, 2004, at 5:40 PM, Adam Cameron wrote:

I would like to see required constructors handled at the language
level in some future CF release.

See BlueDragon for exactly that.
Isn't New Atlanta standing at the top of a slippery slope if they start
adding functionality to their implementation of the CF API, over and
above what the Macromedia product ships with?
Adam



----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]