I can't help you with how things are computed, but JS tick counts won't help, because they're client side. Take a look at the CFTRACE tag. Throw one of those in each template at the top and bottom and you'll get a nice trace in the debug output (below queries, i think) with execution times for section.
cheers, barneyb On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:21:13 -0400, Steve Runyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anybody out there explain exactly how CF derives the execution > times in the debug output? > > I have something that looks like this: > > 9000 ms parent_template.cfm > 0 ms stored_procedure_template.cfm > > The stored procedure itself takes something like 3000 ms to execute, > so obviously that time isn't being counted in > stored_procedure_template's execution time, but where's the rest of > parent_template's time coming from? (I'm rounding and not including > every single template and query that parent_template is calling, but > the sum of all their exeuction times still isn't close to 9 secs.) > Outputting tick counts in JS doesn't shed any light on the missing > time, either. > > TIA! -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
