Another nice way to do this if you're using Eclipse is to use cflog and install the logwatcher plugin.
That will give you a real-time updated view of the log file as the page runs. Very handy for complex pages that have things like cflocation, or use a flash front-end. More info here: http://graysky.sourceforge.net/ AFAIK You can also install any eclipse plugins if you're running He3. Spike -------------------------------------------- Stephen Milligan Code poet for hire http://www.spike.org.uk Do you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Runyon >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:00 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [CFCDev] debug output question > >D'oh! Thanks for catching me on that one, Barney, and thanks for >pointing out cftrace! It did indeed give me some good info, but >unfortunately there's still a lot of "missing" time. > >Oh well, I at least have enough to move forward with for now. If I >figure out where that time went I'll let the list know, if it's a CF >thing and not in my head. > >Thanks! > > >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:39:45 -0700, Barney Boisvert ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I can't help you with how things are computed, but JS tick counts >> won't help, because they're client side. Take a look at the CFTRACE >> tag. Throw one of those in each template at the top and bottom and >> you'll get a nice trace in the debug output (below queries, i think) >> with execution times for section. >> >> cheers, >> barneyb >> >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:21:13 -0400, Steve Runyon ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Can anybody out there explain exactly how CF derives the execution >> > times in the debug output? >> > >> > I have something that looks like this: >> > >> > 9000 ms parent_template.cfm >> > 0 ms stored_procedure_template.cfm >> > >> > The stored procedure itself takes something like 3000 ms >to execute, >> > so obviously that time isn't being counted in >> > stored_procedure_template's execution time, but where's the rest of >> > parent_template's time coming from? (I'm rounding and not >including >> > every single template and query that parent_template is >calling, but >> > the sum of all their exeuction times still isn't close to 9 secs.) >> > Outputting tick counts in JS doesn't shed any light on the missing >> > time, either. >> > >> > TIA! >> >> -- >> Barney Boisvert >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 360.319.6145 >> http://www.barneyb.com >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email >> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' >> in the message of the email. >> >> CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported >> by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). >> >> An archive of the CFCDev list is available at >www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >---------------------------------------------------------- >You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email >to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' >in the message of the email. > >CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported >by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > >An archive of the CFCDev list is available at >www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
