::: mumbles something about hijacked threads ::: :o(
Mark On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:14:01 +1000, Darryl Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roland, > > > For performance reasons. I still use OOP as much as possible, but not > the > > DAO pattern in particular. OOP and DAO/BO in particular add a level of > > abstraction that I don't really need (or necessarily want). There is an > > inherent performance hit in the pattern for one, in that you're > constantly > > transforming data from the database to an object and then back again. > > That's kind of a wasted trip if you don't absolutely need it. > > That sounds exactly like our environment. We use OOP as much as possible > as well, and we don't use "DAO" either. However, we don't pass use > seperate arguments to methods, but rather pass a struct, e.g. > addItem(Struct stItem) and that method passes it back. I guess you can > kind of say this a simple "DAO/Bean". > > Darryl Lyons -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org
