> I really don't agree that CFers should just write Java for models. One > of the big benefits of CF is the speed of development - far faster > than doing it in Java because it's a higher level language.
I agree with that too. It's frustrating because Java's OO is so powerful and flexible that it leads to designing really solid, elegant solutions... but the minute I need to start touching my database, I don't want to mess around with JDBC, I'd *much* rather use CFQUERY. Unfortunately I don't have a clue of how you might write your "business objects" in Java but still use CFC's to handle data access. Is that really even possible? -Cliff ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
