> Obviously you can add an extra flag to the database to indicate that the
> article has no image, but checking for null is a valid way to do it too.

This is probably just a matter of preference, but I don't like to overload
null values with extra meanings. I would either use bits to track this or
even a separate table depending on how much information about the process I
wanted to track the workflow. Anyway, I see the point. I don't agree with
it, but I understand it.

Ben Rogers
http://www.c4.net
v.508.240.0051
f.508.240.0057



----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to 
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the 
email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting 
(www.cfxhosting.com).

CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


Reply via email to