>When I used to write C / C++ coding standards for a living, I think this still counts as a drink.
> they pretty much always banned ?: outright. There are some syntactic subtleties around it and it often led to dense, error-prone code I don't think the density and error-pron`ed-ness of your code is very good grounds for the ommission of something from the language. Extending this rationale, and going on what I see in the MM webforums, we should cancel CF altogether, post haste! ;-) -- Adam This email contains confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify Straker Interactive and delete the email. You are not entitled to use it in any way. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
