On 6/21/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Undoubtedly true. I've never tested it, because relying on that > behaviour would be a bad idea, though from what you say it doesn't > even work to begin with. ;) Conceptually, though, it pretty much > holds up, but it's good to know it won't work in practice.
Yeah, I think this is one of those areas that should be labeled "Here be dragons" because we're sort of assuming that something has array-like behavior and/or struct-like behavior because under some circumstances you can treat it like an array and/or a struct. Unfortunately CFML has quite a few of these because it's been setup to make the *mainstream* use case work even when that is not entirely representative of 'correct' usage... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
