I understand your point, but you misunderstand copyright law. Your copyright for the specification would prevent others from publishing the specification document itself, but would not prevent anyone from implementing the CFL language described by that document.
By analogy (and probably more to your point), the CFML documentation published by Macromedia--both in print and on the web--is all copyrighted by them. So New Atlanta, for example, could not host a copy of the CFML livedocs on our web site or republish any of their copyrighted documentation in the BlueDragon user guides. We are, however, free to implement the CFML language described by that documentation. Vince > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Flanigan > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 10:45 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] WOT: CFML as XML > > > published formal specification of CFML is a two-edged sword > > I am going to research, develop and publish the "Official > ColdFusion Language Specification". The specification will be > a formal notation on the language, CFL. This is something > that does not exist. So it will be new work. I will own the > copyright on the specification. > > The work to research and develop the CFL specification will > be collaborative effort. Members of the collaboration will > have rights to the specification. Others will have to pay for rights. > > Joseph > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
