Well... I don't do everything the same way. Generally my only extends are
from packages, and haven't had the issue you guys mention. Perhaps my
childlike innocence is preventing that because I approach things different.
Sorry, that surely isn't going to help you resolve your style of CFC usage.
I will try to follow the thread and see if a creative concept comes to mind.
(I am still a supporter of adding just a little more "UMF" to the next
version of CF CFCs.) Nando is quite creative... and I am so flooded with
overflow right now... and meeting my deadline for SOS v3 that I am checking
this whole thread out to see if there is ways to do the very thing. (In fact
another CFer has me motivated to build a methodology inside SOS that will
allow Rails features for application building. I am amazed with the cool
possibilities of implementing at least some of the concepts as they fit best
to our language. Working on Active Record concepts right now. I like the
concept of data intuition. Not sure if that should be added in the
methodology level or the site level yet... lots of angles to consider.)

John

P.S.
I can remember when no one seemed to be using CFCs, and now it seems people
use them exclusively to the neglect of tags. (NOTE: not suggesting to solve
the issue with tags.)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Mandel
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Factories and mappings

John - 

And how do you manage/workaround cfargument typing and extends issues?

Mark




----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to 
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the 
email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting 
(www.cfxhosting.com).

CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


Reply via email to