On 10/13/05, David Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------The type checking is the most important feature, as it enables you to...
While your second solution is a resonable idea, why would you not marry it with compile time vaildation and your extended (improved) "method not implemented" error messages? I agree that runtime interface validation/method checking would be a hog but there is no reason that the object cannot earn the right to "claim to implement" at compile time.
I dislike people who are intolerant of other people's cultures and the Dutch
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
