You guys are a bust. For banging on me (not you Tom to my memory) about
pushing morality. Why don't you guys simply accept Ray's standard for Ray's
list since it is his domain. If you have a personal disagreement (or
agreement for that matter that isn't technical) then according to the
"voices" you should be writing Ray. After all this is a technical list, at
least that is what I have been told. Hasn't this thread gone on long enough?
... Or we could be honest that this thread doesn't encroach on our personal
boundaries. So this thread can go on without any complaints! 
</thought>

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Thomas Chiverton
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Admin Notice


On Tuesday 15 November 2005 01:11, Mike Kear wrote:
> I never use OoO messages. (OoO=Out of Office, for those who are coming in

Well, me neither - AFAICT they are a security risk, and impart nothing
useful 
(email is not IM, replies may take weeks normally !)

-- 

Tom Chiverton 
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer


----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the
email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting
(www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]






----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to 
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the 
email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting 
(www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


Reply via email to