>I suppose you could build a CFC wrapper around that CFX tag if you >really wanted to so that if you ever wanted to not use the CFX tag in >the future you would only have to update the code that is dependant on >it in one place.
Not only is that a clever solution, but extra points for not bringing a pattern name into the discussion! g,d&r! /t ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
