> > If you look at the justifications in the Ford, GM and other car company
> > annual reports in the 80s, they all talk about increasing efficiency and
> > "reducing unit-cost".
Isn't ford facing problems now, due to competition from innovative Japanese companies, due to the fact that ford have kept on making the same Big fuel guzzling cars and now there efficiency and cost reducing is biting them in the ass.
While Fords big petrol hungry cars sales are falling Toyota is enjoying a boom in sales.
Now we are getting way off topic
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
- RE: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF frameworks W... Sean Stickle
- Re: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... Sean Corfield
- RE: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... Sean Stickle
- Re: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF fra... Sean Corfield
- Re: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF... Matt Woodward
- RE: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... John Farrar
- Re: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... Barry Beattie
- RE: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... Hal Helms
- RE: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... Hal Helms
- Re: [CFCDev] Free vs. Paid Training for CF framewo... M@ Bourke
- [CFCDev] Syntax Phillip Senn
- Re: [CFCDev] Syntax Matt Woodward
- [CFCDev] Syntax take 2 Phillip Senn
- RE: [CFCDev] Syntax take 2 Phillip Senn
- Re: [CFCDev] Syntax Seth Petry-Johnson
- Re: [CFCDev] Syntax Jason Daiger
