On 3/17/06, Cliff Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't suggest setting the type/returntype to "any"; I just
> suggested using an unqualified component name ("User") instead of a
> fully-qualified component name ("com.company.app1.User"). It should
> only be an issue if you have two CFCs of the same name in different
> packages. That seems like a fair compromise between using a
> fully-qualified component name and type/returntype="any".
>
>
Due to the requirements of accessing CFCs in Flex 2, I would use the
fully qualified path rather than the abbreviated name if you even
*think* you might use Flex 2. This way, you're more forward-thinking
and reduce any potential headaches down the road.
At the very least, if you're not going to use the component name,
return the built-in default object reference, as I discuss here:
http://www.cbetta.com/blog/index.cfm/2005/12/9/return-type-for-returning-cfc-instances
Regards,
Dave.
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the
email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting
(www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
