Re: [CFCDev] How to use returntype correctly

[Jason Daiger]

Dave thanks for the information.  Based on your feedback and reading the post on Ben's blog I seem to have come to the following conclusion. "The use of 'Duck Typing' w/a CFC is 'out' should the CFC ever be needed for use by a Flex application. " Do you (and anyone else knowledgeable on Flex and their use of CFC's) feel that's an accurate conclusion? -Jason Dave Carabetta wrote: On 3/20/06, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And are we still speaking about using a fully qualified *returntype* if your thinking about using Flex? Or are you saying the path used to instantiate the object would need to be fully qualified if you're going to use Flex? My understanding is that you'd need it, regardless of the "direction" you're going in. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org -- Jason Daiger URL: www.jdaiger.com EML: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org