Hi
Tom,
Brian
Rindaldi just brought that up offline. I think Reactor is great, but with recent
possible memory leaks Doug has been troubleshooting, I can't afford to base
everything on top of that today. I also have a bunch of ORM code I wrote for my
procedural generator (believe it or not - it was procedurally written but
supported OO metadata) so I can write something myself fairly
quickly - if only to tide over until Reactor is ready to base a business
around!
Best
Wishes,
Peter
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------Original Message-----Peter,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom McNeer
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?
I realize you're asking about much more than just DAOs. But have you considered using Reactor, or something similar, to handle your database interaction? I think it might solve some of the same issues you're wrestling with in the consideration of a single, generic DAO.
--
Thanks,
Tom
Tom McNeer
MediumCool
http://www.mediumcool.com
530 Means St NW, Suite 110
Atlanta, GA 30318
404.589.0560 ----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
