It isn't the DAO that'd be a transient - it'd be the User business object
that (if ColdSpring served it up) would be a transient (singleton=false).
You'd inject the singleton DAO into it.

Proviso: Some people on the lists have recommended NOT using ColdSpring for
transients, but creating a custom factory instead (or I use LightWire).
Others have used ColdSpring for instantiating their transients without
problems.

Best Wishes,
Peter


On 1/31/08 5:30 AM, "Michael Sharman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
>> - For user.save() you need to inject a DAO into your transients which
>> requires ColdSpring with singleton=false
> 
> Would the DAO composed into the User bean not be a singleton? Why
> would you need a 'per instance' DAO for each and every User bean?
> 
> On Jan 31, 4:16 am, Peter Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> 
>> Been pretty much beaten to death on cfcdev over the years. Short answer, it
>> isn't right or wrong - more a matter of preference.
>> 
>> I prefer syntactically User.save() to UserService.save(User), but that's a
>> pure preference Others prefer it the other way round.
>> 
>> Provisos:
>> - Don't put SQL in the bean - eithr way the saving should be delegated to a
>> DAO
>> - For user.save() you need to inject a DAO into your transients which
>> requires ColdSpring with singleton=false, a custom factory or lightwire.
>> - If you need to support remote method cals, you're going to need a
>> Userservice.save() method. I have one for remote calls ad it just delgates
>> to a new bean it creates. Some may prefer just to have the service do the
>> save all the time, but again it's down to preferences.
>> 
>> Best Wishes,
>> Peter
>> 
>> On 1/30/08 12:03 PM, "Alan Livie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> We currently use the service object to save a bean (which uses a
>>> gateway/DAO its composed with to do the work)
>> 
>>> Another developer has suggested the bean should save really be
>>> responsible for saving itself (again using a DAO its composed with).
>> 
>>> This looks like a good one for a discussion! :-)
>> 
>>> Alan- Hide quoted text -
>> 
>> - Show quoted text -
> > 




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to