Alan:   I like the sound of your approach.  Right now, I created manager
cfcs (service) in the application scope for the calendar and event objects,
and also have gateways, daos, and beans.  I think I'll need to tackle
Coldspring, as I can see things getting messy with dependencies, and I
assume my service cfcs shouldn't be calling another service in the
application scope, especially if this may end up Flexified someday.

Nando:  I've been using Fusebox for some time, this is my first attempt at a
fully OO version.  Do you have any good pointers for integrating Coldspring
and Fusebox....I've found some info, but no good sample apps or tutorials?

All:  Thanks for the words of advice.  I started out with Fusebox quite a
while ago, so figured I'd use it in an OO way so there'd be one less thing
to learn (though I did consider MG and Mach-ii).  I'm trying to do this
first one without ORM or code generators, so I have a better feel for what's
going on.  I think I'll have to pick up Coldspring, though.

Steve

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wise words Nando. Just this morning I was contemplating "porting" Head
> First OOA&D to ColdFusion. By porting I mean taking examples and exercises
> and putting them into CF and augmenting chapters and explanations to fit
> ColdFusion better.  I thought it would be interesting to see what came out.
> I have a theory that I would have a hard time get some OO design concepts
> across accurately and other parts I would completely remove.
>
> I think learning basic OO Analysis concepts prior to picking up an OO
> centric framework is helpful though. I'm not saying take the deep dive but
> maybe get the basics down before diving into the framework. Certainly in
> light of the initial question in this thread I think a framework would be
> helpful.
>
> Adam Haskell
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Transfer makes it very easy to write OO applications. The time you spend
> > learning it is *very* well invested in my opinion.
> >
> > It's also important to realize from the very beginning if you have no OO
> > experience that ColdFusion is a unique environment because it is loosely
> > typed and because of the stateless nature of HTML based web applications.
> > Most books you will read on OO simply don't apply very well to ColdFusion at
> > all - and that's a significant part of the confusion right there. I'm not
> > sure if this is a correct statement, but if I had to do it again, I would
> > focus on learning Coldspring, Transfer and ModelGlue or Fusebox or Mach II.
> > I wouldn't make "learning OO" primary, but leave it secondary as you gain
> > experience, following a few sample applications. I think you'll progress a
> > lot faster that way.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think I can give you an answer that is right you have to make
> > > that decision. What I do with my developers working on these types of 
> > > design
> > > decisions is give them some questions to ask themselves in hope that it 
> > > will
> > > get them to an answer. At the end of the day, especially when you start, 
> > > you
> > > will regret your decision for one reason or another so you want to 
> > > mitigate
> > > as much risk of making the worst decision by asking some questions...
> > > Remember you must answer these I am not saying yes or no to any of them.
> > >
> > > >Have the event object just query the database and populate the array
> > > itself.
> > >
> > > Is your event object becoming too smart at this point? Should it know
> > > where calendars live? Where does the rest of your persistence interaction
> > > live? How will you write a test case to test your object's behavior 
> > > without
> > > relying on a database?
> > >
> > > >Have the event object ask the calendarManager for the array.
> > >
> > > How will this impact your coupling? Is this impact acceptable? Is
> > > there an alternative to this approach that could impact it differently? 
> > > How
> > > will you write a test case to test your object's behavior without relying 
> > > on
> > > a database?
> > >
> > > >Pass the array into the constructor when creating the event object.
> > >
> > > How big is this array? Will all of these objects be used or will the
> > > creation be wasted? Are there alternative constructors? Can my object 
> > > exist
> > > and work without this array? How will you write a test case to test your
> > > object without relying on a database?
> > >
> > > The only one I have a clear direction for is the last question "Can my
> > > object exist and work without this array?" If the answer to that is no 
> > > then
> > > I would strongly recommend going this direction. From the sounds of it 
> > > that
> > > is not the case. Note I have a repeat question in all of them, "How will 
> > > you
> > > write a test case to test your object's behavior without relying on a
> > > database?" Part of the benefit of TDD, objects that are hard to test tend 
> > > to
> > > be objects that violate design principles. Easy testing objects tend to be
> > > good citizens.
> > >
> > > Does anyone else have any good architecture questions Steve can ask
> > > himself to help him make the decision?
> > >
> > > Adam Haskell
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm taking my first plunge into a fully OO application and have what
> > > > I think is a simple question, though I haven't found the answer through
> > > > searching:
> > > >
> > > > I'm developing an events calendar.  An event can be on more than one
> > > > calendar, so when I display an individual event, I want to also display
> > > > which calendars it's on.
> > > >
> > > > So, when I construct my event object (I know, confusing name) what's
> > > > the best way to grab an array of the calendars it occurs on?  I'm 
> > > > thinking
> > > > the array could be a property of the event, but I'm not sure that my 
> > > > event
> > > > should be asking the calendarManager for the array directly.
> > > >
> > > > Options I've contemplated:
> > > >
> > > > Have the event object just query the database and populate the array
> > > > itself.
> > > >
> > > > Have the event object ask the calendarManager for the array.
> > > >
> > > > Pass the array into the constructor when creating the event object.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?  is this where I need to start using and learning
> > > > ColdSpring?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Nando M. Breiter
> > The CarbonZero Project
> > CP 234
> > 6934 Bioggio
> > Switzerland
> > +41 76 303 4477
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to