I am also in the exact same boat as John is when it comes to OO and DB layout. I like the idea of an IBO to house my 1...* relationships, but would you use the IBO in place of a bean for single instances?
Thanks, Jon On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can also look at something like Transfer, which manages these kinds of > relationships for you and caches the CFC instances to mostly remove the > performance hit caused by creating lots of instances on each request. > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:51 AM, John Whish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Coming from a database orientated background I've always thought of >> relationships between two objects in the same way. If I have a company >> object and an employee object then the employee object would hold a >> reference to the company object. Recently I wanted to get a list of >> employees for the company and it got me thinking that instead of looking up >> to the database, maybe I should be holding an array of employees in the >> company object. This has some advantages, but seems like a bad idea. Has >> anyone actually done it like this? >> >> Thanks in advance :-) >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
