=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,Balazs Benics
<[email protected]>,Balazs Benics <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -115,9 +115,22 @@ class CheckerRegistry {
public:
/// Adds a checker to the registry. Use this non-templated overload when your
/// checker requires custom initialization.
- void addChecker(RegisterCheckerFn Fn, ShouldRegisterFunction sfn,
+ void addChecker(RegisterCheckerFn Fn, ShouldRegisterFunction Sfn,
+ StringRef FullName, StringRef DebugName, StringRef Desc,
+ StringRef DocsUri, bool IsHidden);
+
+ /// Adds a checker to the registry. This overload doesn't take a `DebugName`
+ /// (which usually looks like `DivZeroChecker`), so it uses the user-facing
+ /// `FullName` (which usually looks like ``core.DivideZero`) as a debug name.
+ /// THIS IS DEPRECATED and is only provided to preserve compatibility with
+ /// legacy plugins.
+ /// TODO: Eventually remove this from the codebase.
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> > I see. Maybe we could expose a macro to fill the debug name with the
> > stringified token of the class?
> > I'm not a fan of macros but this could be a good use of them if it makes it
> > more ergonomic.
>
> Most of these are mock checkers where the debug name is completely
> irrelevant, they won't be used for actual analysis. In fact I created a
> method called `addMockChecker(StringRef FullName)` which is sufficient for
> these simple situations.
>
> > And btw, could we assert that when adding a checker the debug names are
> > unique?
>
> Perhaps, although providing unique debug names for the mock checkers in the
> unit tests is pointless. Overall, the whole "debug name" concept is an
> extremely unimportant feature that is only used during manual investigation
> of bugs, so IMO it doesn't deserve complex assertions and we should stop
> making it the centerpiece of our architecture that demands reorganizations
> and constrains otherwise good plans.
Makes sense. Lets not enforce this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139256
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
