=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,Balazs Benics
<[email protected]>,Balazs Benics <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
steakhal wrote:
> > What would it take to merge this ASAP?
>
> Just please let me return to the trivial solution where each `CheckerFamily`
> directly defines its `StringRef getDebugName() override { return ClassName;
> }`. I'm strongly convinced that this is the most elegant approach (as I
> explained this in my long comment [#139256
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139256#issuecomment-2895183010)
> ).
Fine, lets do that. I hope we can untangle this in the future.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139256
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
