On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Ok. Are you able/willing to investigate or should I try to con someone > else into it? > > - Daniel > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Sebastian Redl > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> My performance tester is pointing at this for a 2.5% regression in >>> syntax only time. Is this inherent and the price we have to pay for >>> cleanup, or unexpected? >>> >>> >> Unexpected. I do some very rough performance testing on every bunch I >> convert and never notice a slowdown. There is an inherent price (the >> smart pointers carry around a pointer to the Action all the time), >> but I >> expected it to be unnoticeable.
I thought the plan was to be able to #ifdef out smart pointers so we could measure its impact at given any time. - Fariborz >> >> >> Sebastian >> > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
