On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
>> Ok. Are you able/willing to investigate or should I try to con
>> someone
>> else into it?
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Sebastian Redl
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>> My performance tester is pointing at this for a 2.5% regression in
>>>> syntax only time. Is this inherent and the price we have to pay
>>>> for
>>>> cleanup, or unexpected?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Unexpected. I do some very rough performance testing on every
>>> bunch I
>>> convert and never notice a slowdown. There is an inherent price (the
>>> smart pointers carry around a pointer to the Action all the time),
>>> but I
>>> expected it to be unnoticeable.
>
> I thought the plan was to be able to #ifdef out smart pointers so we
> could measure
> its impact at given any time.
Yes, definitely. We just haven't done that work yet.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
