On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alp noted that the current setup on how phab reviews land on the list are > not working for him. I'd be curious whether his setup is special, or > whether there are more widespread problems. If this is more widely > perceived as a problem, please speak up, and I'll make sure to prioritize > the fixes (note that this is unrelated to the "lost email" problem - those > are always highest priority and as far as I'm aware we diagnosed and fixed > all of them within 1-2 business days). > > If you have the feeling that the phab email workflow makes it hard for you > to jump into reviews, keep track of reviews, or understand reviews if > you're not a phab user, please reply to this thread. You don't need to > provide details, "+1", "please fix", or "doesn't work well for me" are all > acceptable replies here - I want to get a feeling for the magnitude of the > problem. > My biggest issue is with email replies not getting into the webui (or getting horribly mangled by being interpreted as "phab markdown"). A minor nuisance is that after replying on phab I get an email of what I just wrote, which is sort of useless. -- Sean Silva > > Thanks, > /Manuel > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > [email protected] http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
