> On 2014-Jul-01, at 13:02, Sean Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 7/1/14, 12:28 PM, Alp Toker wrote: > Specifically the problem I've been seeing is that people using the website are > unable to CC mailing list-based developers. As a result I don't get copied in > on > responses to my review comments, and rarely get any kind of direct mail with > threading. You end up having to dig up historic responses in the mailing list > archive which becomes tedious. > > Often the CC on website reviews will include arbitrary names of people who > have > website accounts, while excluding the actual code owners and recent committers > who you'd expect would be relevant. This leads me to guess that the website is > actively blocking the email addresses of LLVM developers from getting added to > the CC list unless they open an account on the service. > > In fact as far as I can tell, mailing list-based developers are *completely* > excluded from the CC list visible on the website. This creates a really poor > workflow with responses often getting missed, and the right people not seeing > patches (and conversely, it looks like people who aren't really relevant end > up > getting pressured into reviewing a patch in some area). > > +1 > > I've found this frustrating, especially coupled with the fact that folks' > email addresses, phab usernames, and svn usernames are not always obviously > related to each other. > > > +1 > > It would be nice to enforce (or very strongly suggest) a bijection on phab > usernames and svn usernames, and then display them in the tool as something > like: `jsmith2 "John Smith" <[email protected]>` (for some hypothetical > developer). > > > I don't think that enforcing username conventions is the right solution > though. Personally I think the easiest and most convenient thing is to just > be able to use an email address and have phab treat that interchangeably with > the phab username (or even as the canonical name with the phab username as a > convenient alias). I think this is what bugzilla does and it seems to work > well.
+1 > Also, it would be nice if essentially everywhere that the phab username is > displayed it just used the real name. (the real name is going to end up in > the commit somehow anyway) > > -- Sean Silva _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
