One aspect perhaps worth some thought:
typedef double * aligned_double_ptr __attribute__((align_value(64)));
aligned_double_ptr x;
void foo(decltype(x + 3) y, aligned_double_ptr z) {}
Does y also carry the alignment assumption? As it stands in my current patch,
the answer is no -- I think that is the desirable outcome, but I could be
convinced otherwise ;)
Thanks again,
Hal
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Smith" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], "aaron ballman" <[email protected]>,
> [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 9:18:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] align_value attribute in Clang
>
> +Michael Spencer, he was considering proposing something similar for
> standardization.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4635
>
>
>
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4635
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
