>>! In D4663#4, @rengolin wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Looks ok to me, but I'm not the expert. Would be good to have some negative > tests, though. > > cheers, > --renato
I'm not 100% what you mean as "negative tests" in this context. I did add a check that nodes that shouldn't get mangled, aren't, in this new patch. Also addressed the other review by checking MS mangling as well. http://reviews.llvm.org/D4663 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
