>>! In D4663#7, @eliben wrote: > I'm not 100% what you mean as "negative tests" in this context. I did add a > check that nodes that shouldn't get mangled, aren't, in this new patch. Also > addressed the other review by checking MS mangling as well.
That's what I meant. :) Looks good to me, though I'm not the expert here. cheers, --renato http://reviews.llvm.org/D4663 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
