On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:44 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: chapuni >> Date: Wed Jul 30 05:44:35 2014 >> New Revision: 214298 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214298&view=rev >> Log: >> Suppress clang/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c for targeting LLP64. >> >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c >> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c?rev=214298&r1=214297&r2=214298&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c Wed Jul 30 05:44:35 2014 >> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ extern int m1[sizeof(struct packed_fas2) >> extern int m2[__alignof(struct packed_fas2) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; >> >> // Attribute aligned can round down typedefs. PR9253 >> +// REQUIRES: LP64 >> typedef long long __attribute__((aligned(1))) nt; > > Why does this test require LP64? The type here is long long, which is > 64-bits everywhere, and the only other type involved in the struct is > a char. > > Also, the commit log says LLP64 and the comment says LP64...
Ping. ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
