LLP64 is uncertain. I guess ms-compatibilities. Could you fix it? 2014/08/02 9:25 "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:44 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Author: chapuni > >> Date: Wed Jul 30 05:44:35 2014 > >> New Revision: 214298 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214298&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Suppress clang/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c for targeting LLP64. > >> > >> Modified: > >> cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c > >> > >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c > >> URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c?rev=214298&r1=214297&r2=214298&view=diff > >> > ============================================================================== > >> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c (original) > >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/struct-packed-align.c Wed Jul 30 05:44:35 2014 > >> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ extern int m1[sizeof(struct packed_fas2) > >> extern int m2[__alignof(struct packed_fas2) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; > >> > >> // Attribute aligned can round down typedefs. PR9253 > >> +// REQUIRES: LP64 > >> typedef long long __attribute__((aligned(1))) nt; > > > > Why does this test require LP64? The type here is long long, which is > > 64-bits everywhere, and the only other type involved in the struct is > > a char. > > > > Also, the commit log says LLP64 and the comment says LP64... > > Ping. > > ~Aaron >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
