On Thu Aug 21 2014 at 3:37:22 PM Aaron Ballman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +richard, since this is now touching lib/Basic...
> >
> > Looks good to me, but I want Richard to take a look whether this makes
> sense or should be solved differently.
>
> I am confused as to why the solution switched away from using the
> AttrKind enum value and is now using a string.
>

Note that the string is only for the dynamic matchers - the normal C++
matchers still use the enum.


>
> ~Aaron
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to